First Manchester

[motormayhem]

RE: First Manchester
Ahhh right i must of got the wrong end of the stick,sorry.

[Nicholas]

RE: First Manchester
Just looking at what First have gained, they will only need five buses (2 for 31, one each for 95, 525, 527). The other services they have got are either evening/Sunday routes (so will just utilise existing PVR) or Yellow School Buses (so TfGM will provide the buses).

[SF07]

RE: First Manchester
First have updated the Save Manchester page for the price reductions on Monday. Of course, it wouldn't be First without making a mistake, as they mention that the FirstDay, FirstWeek and FirstMonth tickets are valid on the whole routes of the 100 to Warrington and X84 (not 184) to Huddersfield.

http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/greater_...anchester/

[Nicholas]

RE: First Manchester
But the 100 does go to Warrington, and tickets have always been valid over the boundary.

[james]

RE: First Manchester

(05/04/2013 20:14)Nicholas Wrote:  But the 100 does go to Warrington, and tickets have always been valid over the boundary.

nic read the huddersfield bit that is what he hinting at x84 to huddersfield ?

[jimbo]

RE: First Manchester
hmm x84 to huddersfield? typo or... :-\

[P528LND]

RE: First Manchester
We have the X84 and 184 as you probably know, my guess is that they've put X84 without checking properly as from Manchester to Huddersfield is a pretty lengthy journey, they probably thought 'express route' by accident or something along those lines. :P

[jimbo]

RE: First Manchester
Yeah probably, haha, considering their twitter account is from Oldham I assumed their web account is too... Silly mistake :-)

[Polo Mint]

RE: First Manchester
They thought the 135 went from Manchester to the Trafford Centre, so no shocks with other typing errors.

[Nicholas]

RE: First Manchester

(06/04/2013 20:26)james Wrote:  

(05/04/2013 20:14)Nicholas Wrote:  But the 100 does go to Warrington, and tickets have always been valid over the boundary.

nic read the huddersfield bit that is what he hinting at x84 to huddersfield ?

So why the necessity of including the 100 then in the previous post? It isn't a direct quote so isn't needed if that isn't the case.