| 
    
    
 
		
		
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
	
	
		
	 
		
  
		
	
		
			| 
		
			| 
					 10/06/2012, 14:02 
				 |  
						|  | Damien Unregistered
 
 |  |  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 13:53)mic Wrote:  this weeks changes
 34040 and 34057 have gone to First South Yorkshire
 
I thought the above two had been withdrawn
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			|  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 14:02)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 13:53)mic Wrote:  this weeks changes
 34040 and 34057 have gone to First South Yorkshire
 I thought the above two had been withdrawn
 
they had   but now gone to the above
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			| 
		
			| 
					 10/06/2012, 14:22 
				 |  
						|  | Damien Unregistered
 
 |  |  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 14:04)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:02)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 13:53)mic Wrote:  this weeks changes
 34040 and 34057 have gone to First South Yorkshire
 I thought the above two had been withdrawn
 they had   but now gone to the above
 
I see, I guess south yorkshire are a little short
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			|  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 14:22)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:04)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:02)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 13:53)mic Wrote:  this weeks changes
 34040 and 34057 have gone to First South Yorkshire
 I thought the above two had been withdrawn
 they had   but now gone to the above
 I see, I guess south yorkshire are a little short
 
must be as 34019/31/35/82/34293 also went there
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			| 
		
			| 
					 10/06/2012, 14:45 
				 |  
						|  | Damien Unregistered
 
 |  |  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 14:32)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:22)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:04)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:02)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 13:53)mic Wrote:  this weeks changes
 34040 and 34057 have gone to First South Yorkshire
 I thought the above two had been withdrawn
 they had   but now gone to the above
 I see, I guess south yorkshire are a little short
 must be as 34019/31/35/82/34293 also went there
 
Are they having a scrap competition over there lol :P
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			|  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  I think First might have to review the Sunday timetable with the 59/180/184. Was walking up Hollins Road from Hollinwood and see the 180 on the way to Manchester running 20 minutes late. This was followed by the 184 from Huddersfield about ten minutes later with a 58/59 branded bus.
 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			|  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 14:45)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:32)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:22)Damien Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:04)mic Wrote:   (10/06/2012 14:02)Damien Wrote:  I thought the above two had been withdrawn they had   but now gone to the above
 I see, I guess south yorkshire are a little short
 must be as 34019/31/35/82/34293 also went there
 Are they having a scrap competition over there lol :P
 
why not send the ones they sent over back  T-KLFs
 
  (10/06/2012 15:31)SF07 Wrote:  I think First might have to review the Sunday timetable with the 59/180/184. Was walking up Hollins Road from Hollinwood and see the 180 on the way to Manchester running 20 minutes late. This was followed by the 184 from Huddersfield about ten minutes later with a 58/59 branded bus. 
I saw a single decker heading for Huddersfield  just over 1 hour ago  66863 i think
				 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			| 
		
			| 
					 10/06/2012, 18:46 
				 |  
						|  | FirstGroup   East Lancs EL2000
 
  
 | Joined: Jun 2012 |  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  Hi All, Anyone know whats happening with the changes around the Leigh area yet, have the changes been stated on VOSA, i can't find them anywhere....
 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			|  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  The changes have been stated on VOSA, that's how we originally found out they were forthcoming. We don't know the precise details, it has been mooted that the 26 is going, the 25 is replacing it but running via Tyldesley and Atherton instead of Astley, and the X34 is going via Boothstown.
 
 The whole matter is ridiculous tbh.
 |  
			|  |  
	
		
			| 
		
			| 
					 10/06/2012, 18:59 
				 |  
						|  | FirstGroup   East Lancs EL2000
 
  
 | Joined: Jun 2012 |  |  
			| 
					RE: First Manchester  
					 (10/06/2012 18:51)Nicholas Wrote:  The changes have been stated on VOSA, that's how we originally found out they were forthcoming. We don't know the precise details, it has been mooted that the 26 is going, the 25 is replacing it but running via Tyldesley and Atherton instead of Astley, and the X34 is going via Boothstown.
 The whole matter is ridiculous tbh.
 
Will the 12 be remaining to operate via Tyldesley and Atherton, but tbh it would be great to have a 15 minute frequency between Tyldesley and Leigh via Atherton direct using First, seems strange these changes when the busway is likely to be in operation in the next 3 years!
				 |  
			|  |  
		
	 
		
		
	User(s) browsing this thread: 288 Guest(s) 
    
    
 
 
 |