Poll: Should rail be re-nationalised? This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 58.82% |
No | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 41.18% |
Total | 17 votes | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Rail Franchising - The Future
|
|
||||||
RE: Rail Franchising - The Future
(04/10/2012 14:07)507009 Wrote:(04/10/2012 13:53)First Class Wrote: Virgin has had billions pumped into it, and is no better than East Coast who are doing just as well (if not better) than Virgin with far less investment AND has the profits going to the government rather than Branson. As highlighted earlier in this thread, judging a TOCs 'performance by relying on the PPM indicator, many factors of which are not within its own control, is extremely subjective and unreliable. Therefore the PPM KPI should always be read with a considerable 'health warning' rather than parrotted out as done by the tabloids as a neat sound bite. By the way - who paid the lion's share of the WCML upgrade? - not Virgin!! - yet they still wanted to hand back the keys at one point until Stagecoach stepped in and helped blackmail the Govt into letting them delete the payback causes. At least lets agee on something - the current way we operate our rail system is expensive (infation + fare rises for every one of the past 10 years!, inefficient and broken. However, the last Govt chickened-out of mending the process, and the current one will not do anything that upsets their spiv, sorry, city backers. |
||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)