(24/02/2017 15:54)Solo40336 Wrote:  I think those registrations have been made up at some point, as I've not seen them in person the picture I've been sent of one shows it as SN17 MJE. Should be entering service with Middleton from late next week

(19/02/2017 16:23)GRIMSTER02 Wrote:  The branding of buses is great

(24/02/2017 20:17)Dentonian Wrote:  Unfortunately, bus company marketing people don't agree. Whether that is right or wrong is a matter of opinion, but the whole thing is undermined by putting either branded buses or any other sub-type on the wrong routes - or not on routes at all! Today, I travelled on the 76 (on branded 10048) and as with a previous mid morning weekday journey, it was obvious how poorly loaded the service is, with probably four full fare paying passengers on the whole journey to Oldham. Also, even with a diversion round the by-pass and the inevitable German-built saloon cutting across the front of the bus on Manchester Street, we still arrived on West Street two minutes early. I would say only 7 of the 10 branded buses was on the route, leaving five workings with standard Enviro400s. Actually, that wasn't the main example of what I was talking about. As some may know, crew reliefs for the 76 are done at Phillips Park Cemetery (just north of the Etihad). One was being effected as we passed in the opposite direction. And the "taxi" bus being used to get the driver to the unbranded 76 parked up was: 10475. The opposite side of the equation being when I got back to Piccadilly, the 2.03 (pm ie. still off-peak) 203 was standard Enviro400 19417. I'm sure the business plan for Hyde Road's MMCs wasn't to use them earning 0p a day on taxi buses, when the allocation of MMCs is insufficient to cover 201, 203, 250 & X50 in the first place.

I agree with the point about the 330; The child-like drawings look like they've been plajeurised from the Koln-Bonn Airport website, and the claim it runs every 30 minutes is a joke, as the advertised timetable varies considerably during the day, and is then undermined in practice - apparently because someone has totally c**ked up Traffic Light cycle timings in Bredbury and refuses to fix it. The only good thing about the service is that the drivers I've seen are able to keep professional and polite in their jobs, despite the often horrendous punctuality.

Someone mentioned that the use of branded 330s on other routes was down to being instructed to "spread the word" as part of the subsidy agreement. This might well be true, and I can see the point of said buses appearing on such as 216 & 236/7. Might be a "mixed message" on 347 though, given Denton used to have a direct bus to the Airport, and far more frequent connections to Stockport.

(24/02/2017 21:19)Dentonian Wrote:  Probably the latter. They certainly have no respect for customer loyalty, and judging by the poor loadings (off-peak, at least), branding doesn't work. I suppose they would argue that on "captive market" routes people will board a bus whether its got a 66 plate or a 51 plate. Also, they are less likely to be bothered about frippery like wi-fi and "real time" information. The latter still doesn't work on our multi-billion pound Railways after more than a decade, so why would it be expected to work on buses?

(25/02/2017 17:02)Dentonian Wrote:  I should have read your comment more pedantically. Just because you haven't seen the buses in person, what makes you claim the registrations are "made up"? Are you Stagecoach Manchester's Engineering Director?